AHP-模糊综合评价法在军事计量通用基础标准实施效果评估中的应用研究

摘要：

标准实施是标准化活动的关键环节，科学开展标准实施效果评价非常重要。本文以7个典型军事计量通用基础标准为研究对象，构建了以标准适用性、协调性、应用状况和使用成效为决策层，以目标适用性、范围适用性、时效性、可操作性、与国家（军队）法规协调性、与国家（军用）标准协调性、应用程度、被引情况、军事效益、社会效益为准则层的三级评价指标体系。通过层次分析法（Analytic hierarchy process, AHP）确定了各级评价指标的权重；基于模糊判断矩阵及其与相应权重的广义合成运算，获得了各标准实施效果的量化评价结果。研究表明GJB 3756A-2015的实施效果较好，GJB 2749A-2009、GJB 2725A-2001、GJB 1317A-2006的实施效果次之，GJB 5109-2004、GJB 2739A-2009、GJB 2712A-2009的实施效果较差。基于AHP-模糊综合评价法开展的军事计量通用基础标准实施效果评估研究可获得量化评价结果，研究对于有关标准的制修订具有参考价值。

Abstract:

Standards implementation is a key step in promoting standardization action, so the scientific evaluation of the implementation effect of standards is very important. In this paper, seven typical military metrology general fundamental standards are selected as study object, and an index system with applicability, compatibility, application status and usability as second level evaluating indicators, and simultaneously objective applicability, range applicability, timeliness, operability, national (military) regulation compatibility, national (military) standard compatibility, application level, citation situation, military benefits and social benefits as third level evaluating indicators is established as well. The index weights of above indicators are determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), based on which quantified assessment results are obtained by using fuzzy evaluation set and generalized composition calculation. Study results indicate that the implementation effects of GJB 3756A-2015 is very satisfying, followed by GJB 2749A-2009, GJB 2725A-2001 and GJB 1317A-2006, and GJB 5109-2004, GJB 2739A-2009 and GJB 2712A-2009 are worst. In all, the quantified results of standards implementation effects could be obtained by the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, which will provide important reference for standards development and revision.

作者简介：关静，研究员，博士，主要从事军用标准基础理论与信息服务研究。乔星，助理研究员，硕士，主要从事军用标准信息服务与管理研究。王庆民，通信作者，副研究员，硕士，主要从事军事计量通用基础标准制修订研究。古兆兵，副研究员，硕士，主要从事军用标准化发展战略与信息服务研究。胡君朋，助理研究员，博士，主要从事军用标准信息服务研究。